• Overview
  • About this blog
  • Materials
  • Team
  • Archive
  • Legal notice
  • Data protection

Keywords

All Clause Burden of proof Civil proceedings Confidentiality measures Confidentiality order Counsel of record Database Data protection Definition of a Trade Secret Employee Evidence Gathering of evidence German Trade Secrets Act (GeschGehG) Jurisdiction concentration authorization Knowledge gained through experience NDA Protection of Trade Secrets Protective measures Specificity Urgency
  • Menu
  • Sidebar

Posts in Category ‘Case law’

The “Leaked” or “Found” Trade Secret

A real-life case that raises unexpected questions: Does the passive acquisition of a USB flash drive containing trade secrets infringe the German Act on the Protection of Trade Secrets (GeschGehG)? (…) Read more

  • 26. June 2026
  • Filed under: Case law, General, Procedural law

NDAs and contractual penalties: Mandatory consideration of Section 5 of the German Act on the Protection of Trade Secrets (GeschGehG) (?)

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) typically contain liquidated damages clauses to ensure compliance with confidentiality obligations. A recent decision by the Cologne Regional Labor Court (LAG) dated January 29, 2026 (Case No.: (…) Read more

  • 24. May 2026
  • Filed under: Case law, General, Labor law

Berlin Regional Court II: No injunctive relief against public statements despite a confidentiality agreement

Whether a company can base claims for injunctive relief against public statements on a contractual confidentiality agreement was the subject of proceedings before the Berlin Regional Court II. In this (…) Read more

  • 19. March 2026
  • Filed under: Case law, Confidentiality order, General, Protective measures

Baden-Württemberg Regional Labor Court: Protection of Trade Secrets Despite an Invalid Clause in the Employment Contract

Claims arising from the breach of trade secrets may only be asserted by a party that protects its secrets from access by third parties through appropriate measures. These measures also (…) Read more

  • 21. November 2025
  • Filed under: Case law, General, Protective measures

Austrian Supreme Court (öOGH): Loss of rights due to inadequate protective measures

The requirement to protect a trade secret through appropriate confidentiality measures continues to pose challenges for clients and advisors. A recent decision by the Austrian Supreme Court (öOGH) now illustrates (…) Read more

  • 17. December 2024
  • Filed under: Case law, General, International, Protective measures
Gedächtnisleistung vor Gericht

Federal Court of Justice (BGH): Memory performance in Trade Secrets Litigation – The limits of memory

A common defense argument in trade secrets litigation is the claim that the defendant did not copy or take any documents but rather retained certain information in their memory. Given (…) Read more

  • 17. June 2024
  • Filed under: Burden of proof, Case law, General civil law

Nuremberg Higher Regional Court: Urgency is inherent in the trade secret matters

According to the Nuremberg Higher Regional Court, the presumption of urgency under Section 12 (1) of the Unfair Competition Act (UWG) is not applicable by analogy under the German Act (…) Read more

  • 5. December 2023
  • Filed under: Case law, General, General civil law, Procedural law

Karlsruhe Higher Regional Court: An NDA does not replace a confidentiality order

According to the Mannheim Regional Court – a view also held, albeit in a slightly less stringent form, by the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court – the need for legal protection (…) Read more

  • 13. October 2023
  • Filed under: Case law, Confidentiality order, General, Procedural law

Looking back: GeschGehG 2022

To wrap things up, let’s take another look at the activities of the Geheimnisblog over the past year: We published no fewer than 13 posts related to the German Act (…) Read more

  • 28. December 2022
  • Filed under: Case law, General, Labor law

Saxony Regional Labor Court: Enforcement of a Clean Desk Policy

To protect trade secrets, the holder must take appropriate protective measures, including in the area of work organization. In a recently issued decision, the Saxony Regional Labor Court clarified that (…) Read more

  • 30. August 2022
  • Filed under: Case law, Labor law, Protective measures
← Older entries

Dr. Patrick Pommerening berät zu allen Fragen des Gewerblichen Rechtsschutzes und des Urheberrechts. Schwerpunkte … [weiterlesen]

  • Our Team for the GeschGehG and Know-How Protection
Top

Latest Posts

  • The “Leaked” or “Found” Trade Secret

    26. June 2026
  • NDAs and contractual penalties: Mandatory consideration of Section 5 of the German Act on the Protection of Trade Secrets (GeschGehG) (?)

    24. May 2026
  • Berlin Regional Court II: No injunctive relief against public statements despite a confidentiality agreement

    19. March 2026

Topics

  • Burden of proof
  • Case law
  • Confidentiality order
  • Damages
  • Data protection
  • General
  • General civil law
  • International
  • Labor law
  • Procedural law
  • Protective measures
  • Public authorities