• DE
  • EN
  • Overview
  • About this blog
  • Materials
  • Team
  • Archive
  • Legal notice
  • Data protection

Keywords

All Clause Burden of proof Civil proceedings Confidentiality measures Confidentiality order Counsel of record Database Data protection Definition of a Trade Secret Employee Evidence Gathering of evidence German Trade Secrets Act (GeschGehG) Jurisdiction concentration authorization Knowledge gained through experience NDA Protection of Trade Secrets Protective measures Specificity Urgency
  • Menu
  • Sidebar

Posts in Category ‘Protective measures’

Berlin Regional Court II: No injunctive relief against public statements despite a confidentiality agreement

Whether a company can base claims for injunctive relief against public statements on a contractual confidentiality agreement was the subject of proceedings before the Berlin Regional Court II. In this (…) Read more

  • 19. March 2026
  • Filed under: Case law, Confidentiality order, General, Protective measures

Nuremberg Higher Regional Court: Requirements for the publication of judgments pursuant to Sec. 21 of the German Trade Secret Act (GeschGehG)

In its recently published decision, the Nuremberg Higher Regional Court addressed the requirements for the publication of a judgment pursuant to Section 21 GeschGehG, thereby issuing (as far as can (…) Read more

  • 28. January 2026
  • Filed under: General, Protective measures

Baden-Württemberg Regional Labor Court: Protection of Trade Secrets Despite an Invalid Clause in the Employment Contract

Claims arising from the breach of trade secrets may only be asserted by a party that protects its secrets from access by third parties through appropriate measures. These measures also (…) Read more

  • 21. November 2025
  • Filed under: Case law, General, Protective measures

Database access credentials as Trade Secrets

Personalized access credentials (passwords) are one of the typical means of protecting digitally stored trade secrets from unauthorized access. The Regional Court of Nuremberg-Fürth recently ruled that such access credentials (…) Read more

  • 18. March 2025
  • Filed under: General, Protective measures

Austrian Supreme Court (öOGH): Loss of rights due to inadequate protective measures

The requirement to protect a trade secret through appropriate confidentiality measures continues to pose challenges for clients and advisors. A recent decision by the Austrian Supreme Court (öOGH) now illustrates (…) Read more

  • 17. December 2024
  • Filed under: Case law, General, International, Protective measures

Saxony Regional Labor Court: Enforcement of a Clean Desk Policy

To protect trade secrets, the holder must take appropriate protective measures, including in the area of work organization. In a recently issued decision, the Saxony Regional Labor Court clarified that (…) Read more

  • 30. August 2022
  • Filed under: Case law, Labor law, Protective measures

Millions in damages for breach of an NDA

Signing a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) is often viewed as a tedious obligation and a mere formality. A recent ruling from Spain demonstrates that no party involved should underestimate the significance (…) Read more

  • 3. August 2022
  • Filed under: Case law, Damages, International, Protective measures

Schleswig Higher Regional Court: Updates on reasonable confidentiality measures

A ruling by the Schleswig Higher Regional Court dated April 28, 2022 (Case No. 6 U 39/21) contains some interesting and highly practical insights into the concept of trade secrets (…) Read more

  • 18. May 2022
  • Filed under: General, Protective measures

Hamburg Labor Court: Cocktail recipe is not a trade secret

In a labor law case, the Hamburg Labor Court ruled that a cocktail recipe did not qualify as a trade secret (decision dated July 1, 2021, Case No. 4 Ca (…) Read more

  • 29. March 2022
  • Filed under: Case law, General, Labor law, Protective measures

Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court: A divided concept of confidentiality?

In its decision of September 21, 2021 (Case No. 15 W 6/21, GRUR 2022, 75 – Disclosure of Expert Opinion (not publicly available)), the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court held that (…) Read more

  • 31. January 2022
  • Filed under: Case law, General, General civil law, Protective measures
← Older entries
  • Our Team for the GeschGehG and Know-How Protection
Top

Latest Posts

  • The “Leaked” or “Found” Trade Secret

    26. June 2026
  • NDAs and contractual penalties: Mandatory consideration of Section 5 of the German Act on the Protection of Trade Secrets (GeschGehG) (?)

    24. May 2026
  • Berlin Regional Court II: No injunctive relief against public statements despite a confidentiality agreement

    19. March 2026

Topics

  • Burden of proof
  • Case law
  • Confidentiality order
  • Damages
  • Data protection
  • General
  • General civil law
  • International
  • Labor law
  • Procedural law
  • Protective measures
  • Public authorities