<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>General civil law &#8211; Geheimnisblog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/themen/general-civil-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://geheimnisblog.de</link>
	<description>GeschGehG and Know-How Protection</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:08:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Frankfurt Regional Court: Perpetual jurisdiction of Labor Courts for action against former employees (?)</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/frankfurt-regional-court-perpetual-jurisdiction-of-labor-courts-for-action-against-former-employees/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 18:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General civil law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procedural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisdiction concentration authorization]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1189</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Numerous proceedings under the German Act on the Protection of Trade Secrets (GeschGehG) relate to an employment relationship. This has significant implications for legal advice and litigation, as such cases (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/frankfurt-regional-court-perpetual-jurisdiction-of-labor-courts-for-action-against-former-employees/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Section 273a of the German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO) in force: Enhanced protection of Trade Secrets in Civil Proceedings</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/the-new-section-273a-of-the-german-code-of-civil-procedure-zpo-in-force-enhanced-protection-of-trade-secrets-in-civil-proceedings/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 15:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Confidentiality order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General civil law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procedural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1159</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On April 1, 2025, Section 273a of the German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO) took effect, thereby resolving &#8211; to a certain extent &#8211; the dilemma faced by parties to (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/the-new-section-273a-of-the-german-code-of-civil-procedure-zpo-in-force-enhanced-protection-of-trade-secrets-in-civil-proceedings/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Court of Justice (BGH): Memory performance in Trade Secrets Litigation – The limits of memory</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/federal-court-of-justice-bgh-memory-performance-in-trade-secrets-litigation-the-limits-of-memory/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Stefan Maaßen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Burden of proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General civil law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German Federal Court of Justice (BGH)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory-based performance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1207</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A common defense argument in trade secrets litigation is the claim that the defendant did not copy or take any documents but rather retained certain information in their memory. Given (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/federal-court-of-justice-bgh-memory-performance-in-trade-secrets-litigation-the-limits-of-memory/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuremberg Higher Regional Court: Urgency is inherent in the trade secret matters</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/nuremberg-higher-regional-court-urgency-is-inherent-in-the-trade-secret-matters/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Stefan Maaßen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 09:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General civil law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procedural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urgency]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1211</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[According to the Nuremberg Higher Regional Court, the presumption of urgency under Section 12 (1) of the Unfair Competition Act (UWG) is not applicable by analogy under the German Act (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/nuremberg-higher-regional-court-urgency-is-inherent-in-the-trade-secret-matters/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The new Section 273a of the German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO): Enhanced protection of Trade Secrets in Civil Proceedings</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/the-new-section-273a-of-the-german-code-of-civil-procedure-zpo-enhanced-protection-of-trade-secrets-in-civil-proceedings/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Stefan Maaßen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General civil law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protection of Trade Secrets]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1213</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On April 1, 2025, Section 273a of the German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO) took effect, thereby resolving &#8211; to a certain extent &#8211; the dilemma faced by parties to (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/the-new-section-273a-of-the-german-code-of-civil-procedure-zpo-enhanced-protection-of-trade-secrets-in-civil-proceedings/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hello Whistleblower Protection Act, goodbye NDA</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/hello-whistleblower-protection-act-goodbye-nda/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 17:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General civil law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German Whistleblower Protection Act (HinSchG)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-disclosure agreement (NDA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1178</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The proposed Whistleblower Protection Act (HinSchG) is intended to ensure better protection for so-called “whistleblowers” in the interest of uncovering misconduct. The focus is on protecting employees so they can (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/hello-whistleblower-protection-act-goodbye-nda/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court: A divided concept of confidentiality?</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/duesseldorf-higher-regional-court-a-divided-concept-of-confidentiality/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 17:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General civil law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protective measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confidentiality measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definition of a Trade Secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf (OLG Düsseldorf)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1233</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In its decision of September 21, 2021 (Case No. 15 W 6/21, GRUR 2022, 75 – Disclosure of Expert Opinion (not publicly available)), the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court held that (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/duesseldorf-higher-regional-court-a-divided-concept-of-confidentiality/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does an unjustified cease-and-desist letter alleging a (supposed) violation of the German Act on the Protection of Trade Secrets (GeschGehG) violate Section 823 of the German Civil Code (BGB)?</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/does-an-unjustified-cease-and-desist-letter-alleging-a-supposed-violation-of-the-german-act-on-the-protection-of-trade-secrets-geschgehg-violate-section-823-of-the-german-civil-code-bgb/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 16:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General civil law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cease-and-desist letter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German Civil Code (BGB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German Trade Secrets Act (GeschGehG)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German Trade Secrets Act (GeschGehG) and German Civil Code (BGB)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protection of Trade Secrets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unjustified IP infringement warning]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1261</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As is well known, the legal treatment of unjustified cease-and-desist letters depends on the legal basis on which the party issuing the letter bases its claims: A culpably unjustified cease-and-desist (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/does-an-unjustified-cease-and-desist-letter-alleging-a-supposed-violation-of-the-german-act-on-the-protection-of-trade-secrets-geschgehg-violate-section-823-of-the-german-civil-code-bgb/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
