<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Burden of proof &#8211; Geheimnisblog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/themen/burden-of-proof/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://geheimnisblog.de</link>
	<description>GeschGehG and Know-How Protection</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 15:41:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Reverse Engineering and the Burden of Proof in GeschGehG Proceedings</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/reverse-engineering-and-the-burden-of-proof-in-geschgehg-proceedings-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Burden of proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definition of a Trade Secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gathering of evidence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1164</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We have previously discussed the particular difficulties of presenting evidence in GeschGehG proceedings in another article (here). An analysis of a decision by the Aachen Labor Court illustrates the objections (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/reverse-engineering-and-the-burden-of-proof-in-geschgehg-proceedings-2/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
