<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Burden of proof &#8211; Geheimnisblog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/themen/burden-of-proof/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://geheimnisblog.de</link>
	<description>GeschGehG and Know-How Protection</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:03:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Federal Court of Justice (BGH): Memory performance in Trade Secrets Litigation – The limits of memory</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/federal-court-of-justice-bgh-memory-performance-in-trade-secrets-litigation-the-limits-of-memory/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Stefan Maaßen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Burden of proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General civil law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German Federal Court of Justice (BGH)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory-based performance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1207</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A common defense argument in trade secrets litigation is the claim that the defendant did not copy or take any documents but rather retained certain information in their memory. Given (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/federal-court-of-justice-bgh-memory-performance-in-trade-secrets-litigation-the-limits-of-memory/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frankfurt Local Court: Confidentiality of exam questions (?)</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/frankfurt-local-court-confidentiality-of-exam-questions/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Stefan Maaßen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Burden of proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procedural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gathering of evidence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Frankfurt Local Court had to rule on the right to receive a free copy of the results of a German language test. Such requests for disclosure have recently become (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/frankfurt-local-court-confidentiality-of-exam-questions/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aachen Labor Court: Reverse Engineering and the end of the GeschGehG</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/aachen-labor-court-reverse-engineering-and-the-end-of-the-geschgehg/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 16:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Burden of proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definition of a Trade Secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reverse Engineering]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1219</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In its decision dated January 13, 2022, the Aachen Labor Court made several problematic statements regarding the German Act on the Protection of Trade Secrets (the Geheimnisblog has analyzed the (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/aachen-labor-court-reverse-engineering-and-the-end-of-the-geschgehg/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reverse Engineering and the Burden of Proof in GeschGehG Proceedings</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/reverse-engineering-and-the-burden-of-proof-in-geschgehg-proceedings-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Burden of proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definition of a Trade Secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gathering of evidence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1164</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We have previously discussed the particular difficulties of presenting evidence in GeschGehG proceedings in another article (here). An analysis of a decision by the Aachen Labor Court illustrates the objections (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/reverse-engineering-and-the-burden-of-proof-in-geschgehg-proceedings-2/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
