<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Protective measures &#8211; Geheimnisblog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/schlagwort/protective-measures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://geheimnisblog.de</link>
	<description>GeschGehG and Know-How Protection</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Nuremberg Higher Regional Court: Requirements for the publication of judgments pursuant to Sec. 21 of the German Trade Secret Act (GeschGehG)</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/nuremberg-higher-regional-court-requirements-for-the-publication-of-judgments-pursuant-to-sec-21-of-the-german-trade-secret-act-geschgehg/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 17:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protective measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In its recently published decision, the Nuremberg Higher Regional Court addressed the requirements for the publication of a judgment pursuant to Section 21 GeschGehG, thereby issuing (as far as can (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/nuremberg-higher-regional-court-requirements-for-the-publication-of-judgments-pursuant-to-sec-21-of-the-german-trade-secret-act-geschgehg/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Burden of Proof and presentation of evidence in proceedings under the German Trade Secret Act – GeschGehG (Part 1)</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/burden-of-proof-and-presentation-of-evidence-in-proceedings-under-the-german-trade-secret-act-geschgehg-part-1/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 14:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Procedural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burden of proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protective measures]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1157</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Enforcing trade secrets in litigation poses particular challenges for the plaintiff or the party filing the motion. Central to this are the issues of the burden of proof and the (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/burden-of-proof-and-presentation-of-evidence-in-proceedings-under-the-german-trade-secret-act-geschgehg-part-1/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Database access credentials as Trade Secrets</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/database-access-credentials-as-trade-secrets/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protective measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1205</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Personalized access credentials (passwords) are one of the typical means of protecting digitally stored trade secrets from unauthorized access. The Regional Court of Nuremberg-Fürth recently ruled that such access credentials (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/database-access-credentials-as-trade-secrets/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saxony Regional Labor Court: Enforcement of a Clean Desk Policy</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/saxony-regional-labor-court-enforcement-of-a-clean-desk-policy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 08:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protective measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Desk Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work organization]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1216</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[To protect trade secrets, the holder must take appropriate protective measures, including in the area of work organization. In a recently issued decision, the Saxony Regional Labor Court clarified that (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/saxony-regional-labor-court-enforcement-of-a-clean-desk-policy/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schleswig Higher Regional Court: Updates on reasonable confidentiality measures</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/schleswig-higher-regional-court-updates-on-reasonable-confidentiality-measures/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 13:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protective measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confidentiality measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definition of a Trade Secret]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1225</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A ruling by the Schleswig Higher Regional Court dated April 28, 2022 (Case No. 6 U 39/21) contains some interesting and highly practical insights into the concept of trade secrets (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/schleswig-higher-regional-court-updates-on-reasonable-confidentiality-measures/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
