<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Evidence &#8211; Geheimnisblog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/schlagwort/evidence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://geheimnisblog.de</link>
	<description>GeschGehG and Know-How Protection</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:11:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Federal Court of Justice (BGH): Memory performance in Trade Secrets Litigation – The limits of memory</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/federal-court-of-justice-bgh-memory-performance-in-trade-secrets-litigation-the-limits-of-memory/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Stefan Maaßen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Burden of proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General civil law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German Federal Court of Justice (BGH)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory-based performance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1207</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A common defense argument in trade secrets litigation is the claim that the defendant did not copy or take any documents but rather retained certain information in their memory. Given (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/federal-court-of-justice-bgh-memory-performance-in-trade-secrets-litigation-the-limits-of-memory/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frankfurt Local Court: Confidentiality of exam questions (?)</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/frankfurt-local-court-confidentiality-of-exam-questions/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Stefan Maaßen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Burden of proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procedural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gathering of evidence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Frankfurt Local Court had to rule on the right to receive a free copy of the results of a German language test. Such requests for disclosure have recently become (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/frankfurt-local-court-confidentiality-of-exam-questions/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case law on reasonable confidentiality measures</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/case-law-on-reasonable-confidentiality-measures/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protective measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confidentiality measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1245</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Legal uncertainty persists for holders of trade secrets regarding the specific requirements for “reasonable confidentiality measures” within the meaning of Section 2 no. 1 b) of the German Act on (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/case-law-on-reasonable-confidentiality-measures/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Risk of a violation of the trade secrets act following an employee’s change of employer &#8211; is the “Clean Team” a solution?</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/risk-of-a-violation-of-the-trade-secrets-act-following-an-employees-change-of-employer-is-the-clean-team-a-solution/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procedural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Change of personnel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gathering of evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge gained through experience]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1257</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A common trigger for the German Act on the Protection of Trade Secret (GeschGehG) proceedings is an employee’s move to a new employer. Not only the &#8211; impermissible &#8211; removal (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/risk-of-a-violation-of-the-trade-secrets-act-following-an-employees-change-of-employer-is-the-clean-team-a-solution/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Presenting evidence in a GeschGehG-Trial (German Act on the Protection of Trade Secret)</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/presenting-evidence-in-a-geschgehg-trial-german-act-on-the-protection-of-trade-secret/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Procedural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burden of proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gathering of evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge gained through experience]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1249</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If, after an employee leaves the company, the employee’s new employer &#8211; or even a company newly founded by that former employee &#8211; brings a competing product to market, there (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/presenting-evidence-in-a-geschgehg-trial-german-act-on-the-protection-of-trade-secret/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
