<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Employee &#8211; Geheimnisblog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/schlagwort/employee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://geheimnisblog.de</link>
	<description>GeschGehG and Know-How Protection</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:11:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>NDAs and contractual penalties: Mandatory consideration of Section 5 of the German Act on the Protection of Trade Secrets (GeschGehG) (?)</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/ndas-and-contractual-penalties-mandatory-consideration-of-section-5-of-the-german-act-on-the-protection-of-trade-secrets-geschgehg/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verwaltung]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 13:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confidentiality order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contractual penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) typically contain liquidated damages clauses to ensure compliance with confidentiality obligations. A recent decision by the Cologne Regional Labor Court (LAG) dated January 29, 2026 (Case No.: (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/ndas-and-contractual-penalties-mandatory-consideration-of-section-5-of-the-german-act-on-the-protection-of-trade-secrets-geschgehg/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frankfurt Regional Court: Perpetual jurisdiction of Labor Courts for action against former employees (?)</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/frankfurt-regional-court-perpetual-jurisdiction-of-labor-courts-for-action-against-former-employees/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 18:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General civil law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procedural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisdiction concentration authorization]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1189</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Numerous proceedings under the German Act on the Protection of Trade Secrets (GeschGehG) relate to an employment relationship. This has significant implications for legal advice and litigation, as such cases (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/frankfurt-regional-court-perpetual-jurisdiction-of-labor-courts-for-action-against-former-employees/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Court of Justice (BGH): Memory performance in Trade Secrets Litigation – The limits of memory</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/federal-court-of-justice-bgh-memory-performance-in-trade-secrets-litigation-the-limits-of-memory/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Stefan Maaßen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Burden of proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General civil law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German Federal Court of Justice (BGH)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory-based performance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1207</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A common defense argument in trade secrets litigation is the claim that the defendant did not copy or take any documents but rather retained certain information in their memory. Given (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/federal-court-of-justice-bgh-memory-performance-in-trade-secrets-litigation-the-limits-of-memory/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saxony Regional Labor Court: Enforcement of a Clean Desk Policy</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/saxony-regional-labor-court-enforcement-of-a-clean-desk-policy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 08:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protective measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Desk Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work organization]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1216</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[To protect trade secrets, the holder must take appropriate protective measures, including in the area of work organization. In a recently issued decision, the Saxony Regional Labor Court clarified that (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/saxony-regional-labor-court-enforcement-of-a-clean-desk-policy/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hamburg Labor Court: Cocktail recipe is not a trade secret</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/hamburg-labor-court-cocktail-recipe-is-not-a-trade-secret/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 13:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protective measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confidentiality measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definition of a Trade Secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specificity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1227</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a labor law case, the Hamburg Labor Court ruled that a cocktail recipe did not qualify as a trade secret (decision dated July 1, 2021, Case No. 4 Ca (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/hamburg-labor-court-cocktail-recipe-is-not-a-trade-secret/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case law on reasonable confidentiality measures</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/case-law-on-reasonable-confidentiality-measures/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protective measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confidentiality measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1245</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Legal uncertainty persists for holders of trade secrets regarding the specific requirements for “reasonable confidentiality measures” within the meaning of Section 2 no. 1 b) of the German Act on (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/case-law-on-reasonable-confidentiality-measures/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Risk of a violation of the trade secrets act following an employee’s change of employer &#8211; is the “Clean Team” a solution?</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/risk-of-a-violation-of-the-trade-secrets-act-following-an-employees-change-of-employer-is-the-clean-team-a-solution/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procedural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Change of personnel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gathering of evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge gained through experience]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1257</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A common trigger for the German Act on the Protection of Trade Secret (GeschGehG) proceedings is an employee’s move to a new employer. Not only the &#8211; impermissible &#8211; removal (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/risk-of-a-violation-of-the-trade-secrets-act-following-an-employees-change-of-employer-is-the-clean-team-a-solution/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gathering evidence by accessing employees’ email accounts</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/gathering-evidence-by-accessing-employees-email-accounts/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 16:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procedural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gathering of evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German Trade Secrets Act (GeschGehG) and GDPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mailbox]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1243</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It’s a typical scenario: A former employee starts their own business or goes to work for a competitor. There is some evidence to suggest that the employee used trade secrets (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/gathering-evidence-by-accessing-employees-email-accounts/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
