<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Confidentiality order &#8211; Geheimnisblog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/schlagwort/confidentiality-order/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://geheimnisblog.de</link>
	<description>GeschGehG and Know-How Protection</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:07:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>NDAs and contractual penalties: Mandatory consideration of Section 5 of the German Act on the Protection of Trade Secrets (GeschGehG) (?)</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/ndas-and-contractual-penalties-mandatory-consideration-of-section-5-of-the-german-act-on-the-protection-of-trade-secrets-geschgehg/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verwaltung]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 13:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confidentiality order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contractual penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) typically contain liquidated damages clauses to ensure compliance with confidentiality obligations. A recent decision by the Cologne Regional Labor Court (LAG) dated January 29, 2026 (Case No.: (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/ndas-and-contractual-penalties-mandatory-consideration-of-section-5-of-the-german-act-on-the-protection-of-trade-secrets-geschgehg/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Berlin Regional Court II: No injunctive relief against public statements despite a confidentiality agreement</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/berlin-regional-court-ii-no-prohibition-on-making-statements-despite-a-confidentiality-agreement/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verwaltung]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 11:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confidentiality order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protective measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Clause]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1149</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Whether a company can base claims for injunctive relief against public statements on a contractual confidentiality agreement was the subject of proceedings before the Berlin Regional Court II. In this (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/berlin-regional-court-ii-no-prohibition-on-making-statements-despite-a-confidentiality-agreement/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Section 273a of the German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO) in force: Enhanced protection of Trade Secrets in Civil Proceedings</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/the-new-section-273a-of-the-german-code-of-civil-procedure-zpo-in-force-enhanced-protection-of-trade-secrets-in-civil-proceedings/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 15:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Confidentiality order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General civil law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procedural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1159</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On April 1, 2025, Section 273a of the German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO) took effect, thereby resolving &#8211; to a certain extent &#8211; the dilemma faced by parties to (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/the-new-section-273a-of-the-german-code-of-civil-procedure-zpo-in-force-enhanced-protection-of-trade-secrets-in-civil-proceedings/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karlsruhe Higher Regional Court: An NDA does not replace a confidentiality order</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/karlsruhe-higher-regional-court-an-nda-does-not-replace-a-confidentiality-order/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Stefan Maaßen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2023 11:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confidentiality order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procedural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1180</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[According to the Mannheim Regional Court &#8211; a view also held, albeit in a slightly less stringent form, by the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court &#8211; the need for legal protection (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/karlsruhe-higher-regional-court-an-nda-does-not-replace-a-confidentiality-order/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sections 16 and 19 of the German Act on the Protection of Trade Secrets (GeschGehG) in practice</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/sections-16-and-19-of-the-german-act-on-the-protection-of-trade-secrets-geschgehg-in-practice/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 14:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Confidentiality order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counsel of record]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German Trade Secrets Act (GeschGehG)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1174</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One of the key changes introduced by the GeschGehG is the enhancement of trade secret protection during court proceedings. Based on Sections 16 and 19 GeschGehG, the court may issue (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/sections-16-and-19-of-the-german-act-on-the-protection-of-trade-secrets-geschgehg-in-practice/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Court of Justice (BGH): First ruling on the confidentiality order under Sections 16 and 19 of the German Act on the Protection of Trade Secrets (GeschGehG)</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/federal-court-of-justice-bgh-first-ruling-on-the-confidentiality-order-under-sections-16-and-19-of-the-german-act-on-the-protection-of-trade-secrets-geschgehg/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confidentiality order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procedural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counsel of record]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1231</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[With the GeschGehG, the legislature has created new options for maintaining the confidentiality of information during court proceedings. In practice, however, the provisions of Sections 16 et seqq. of the (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/federal-court-of-justice-bgh-first-ruling-on-the-confidentiality-order-under-sections-16-and-19-of-the-german-act-on-the-protection-of-trade-secrets-geschgehg/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
