<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Burden of proof &#8211; Geheimnisblog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/schlagwort/burden-of-proof/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://geheimnisblog.de</link>
	<description>GeschGehG and Know-How Protection</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:08:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Burden of Proof and presentation of evidence in proceedings under the German Trade Secret Act – GeschGehG (Part 2)</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/burden-of-proof-and-presentation-of-evidence-in-proceedings-under-the-german-trade-secret-act-geschgehg-part-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 14:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Procedural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burden of proof]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1172</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Burden of Proof for the Existence of an Act of Infringement The trade secret owner bears not only the burden of proof for the existence of a trade secret (see (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/burden-of-proof-and-presentation-of-evidence-in-proceedings-under-the-german-trade-secret-act-geschgehg-part-2/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Burden of Proof and presentation of evidence in proceedings under the German Trade Secret Act – GeschGehG (Part 1)</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/burden-of-proof-and-presentation-of-evidence-in-proceedings-under-the-german-trade-secret-act-geschgehg-part-1/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 14:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Procedural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burden of proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protective measures]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1157</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Enforcing trade secrets in litigation poses particular challenges for the plaintiff or the party filing the motion. Central to this are the issues of the burden of proof and the (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/burden-of-proof-and-presentation-of-evidence-in-proceedings-under-the-german-trade-secret-act-geschgehg-part-1/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Court of Justice (BGH): Memory performance in Trade Secrets Litigation – The limits of memory</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/federal-court-of-justice-bgh-memory-performance-in-trade-secrets-litigation-the-limits-of-memory/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Stefan Maaßen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Burden of proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General civil law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German Federal Court of Justice (BGH)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory-based performance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1207</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A common defense argument in trade secrets litigation is the claim that the defendant did not copy or take any documents but rather retained certain information in their memory. Given (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/federal-court-of-justice-bgh-memory-performance-in-trade-secrets-litigation-the-limits-of-memory/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frankfurt Local Court: Confidentiality of exam questions (?)</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/frankfurt-local-court-confidentiality-of-exam-questions/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Stefan Maaßen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Burden of proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procedural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gathering of evidence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Frankfurt Local Court had to rule on the right to receive a free copy of the results of a German language test. Such requests for disclosure have recently become (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/frankfurt-local-court-confidentiality-of-exam-questions/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aachen Labor Court: Reverse Engineering and the end of the GeschGehG</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/aachen-labor-court-reverse-engineering-and-the-end-of-the-geschgehg/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 16:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Burden of proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definition of a Trade Secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reverse Engineering]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1219</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In its decision dated January 13, 2022, the Aachen Labor Court made several problematic statements regarding the German Act on the Protection of Trade Secrets (the Geheimnisblog has analyzed the (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/aachen-labor-court-reverse-engineering-and-the-end-of-the-geschgehg/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Presenting evidence in a GeschGehG-Trial (German Act on the Protection of Trade Secret)</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/presenting-evidence-in-a-geschgehg-trial-german-act-on-the-protection-of-trade-secret/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Procedural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burden of proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gathering of evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge gained through experience]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1249</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If, after an employee leaves the company, the employee’s new employer &#8211; or even a company newly founded by that former employee &#8211; brings a competing product to market, there (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/presenting-evidence-in-a-geschgehg-trial-german-act-on-the-protection-of-trade-secret/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
