<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>All Clause &#8211; Geheimnisblog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/schlagwort/all-clause/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://geheimnisblog.de</link>
	<description>GeschGehG and Know-How Protection</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:12:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>NDAs and contractual penalties: Mandatory consideration of Section 5 of the German Act on the Protection of Trade Secrets (GeschGehG) (?)</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/ndas-and-contractual-penalties-mandatory-consideration-of-section-5-of-the-german-act-on-the-protection-of-trade-secrets-geschgehg/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verwaltung]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 13:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confidentiality order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contractual penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) typically contain liquidated damages clauses to ensure compliance with confidentiality obligations. A recent decision by the Cologne Regional Labor Court (LAG) dated January 29, 2026 (Case No.: (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/ndas-and-contractual-penalties-mandatory-consideration-of-section-5-of-the-german-act-on-the-protection-of-trade-secrets-geschgehg/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Berlin Regional Court II: No injunctive relief against public statements despite a confidentiality agreement</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/berlin-regional-court-ii-no-prohibition-on-making-statements-despite-a-confidentiality-agreement/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verwaltung]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 11:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confidentiality order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protective measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Clause]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1149</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Whether a company can base claims for injunctive relief against public statements on a contractual confidentiality agreement was the subject of proceedings before the Berlin Regional Court II. In this (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/berlin-regional-court-ii-no-prohibition-on-making-statements-despite-a-confidentiality-agreement/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baden-Württemberg Regional Labor Court: Protection of Trade Secrets Despite an Invalid Clause in the Employment Contract</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/baden-wuerttemberg-regional-labor-court-protection-of-trade-secrets-despite-an-invalid-clause-in-the-employment-contract/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 11:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protective measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confidentiality measures]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1155</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Claims arising from the breach of trade secrets may only be asserted by a party that protects its secrets from access by third parties through appropriate measures. These measures also (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/baden-wuerttemberg-regional-labor-court-protection-of-trade-secrets-despite-an-invalid-clause-in-the-employment-contract/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schleswig Higher Regional Court: Updates on reasonable confidentiality measures</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/schleswig-higher-regional-court-updates-on-reasonable-confidentiality-measures/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 13:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protective measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confidentiality measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definition of a Trade Secret]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1225</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A ruling by the Schleswig Higher Regional Court dated April 28, 2022 (Case No. 6 U 39/21) contains some interesting and highly practical insights into the concept of trade secrets (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/schleswig-higher-regional-court-updates-on-reasonable-confidentiality-measures/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caution: A Broad Non-Disclosure Clause in an Employment Contract complicates the enforcement of claims under the German Act on the Protection of Trade Secrets (GeschGehG)</title>
		<link>https://geheimnisblog.de/en/caution-a-broad-non-disclosure-clause-in-an-employment-contract-complicates-the-enforcement-of-claims-under-the-german-act-on-the-protection-of-trade-secrets-geschgehg/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie-Sarah Boudon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 17:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protective measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confidentiality measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment contract]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://geheimnisblog.de/?p=1263</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Employment contracts or termination agreements typically include a clause protecting trade secrets. However, if the provisions are too broad, the prohibition is invalid due to a violation of Section 138 (&#8230;) <a href="https://geheimnisblog.de/en/caution-a-broad-non-disclosure-clause-in-an-employment-contract-complicates-the-enforcement-of-claims-under-the-german-act-on-the-protection-of-trade-secrets-geschgehg/">Read more</a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
